| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
wapati
Joined: 10 Jun 2008
Posts: 472
Location: Brampton, Ontario, Canada.
|
 Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:43 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| keith wrote: | It's all in a name.
Maybe a naked single is a mutant franken sashimi hidden pair?
Keith |
Keith, the point of language is communication. If you decide to call autos and trucks "bicycles", because they all use wheels and carry people, that is going to make it hard for people to know what you are talking about. Is there a good point to that?
This is an old argument, the als people claim that Sue de coq and xyz-wings and xy-wings (and so on) are just ALS and they don't like subsets having names. For that matter chaining folk claim xy-wings and such as just chains, why differentiate? Oh, colorful folk don't see swordfish unless they daub ink on them, and still they overfill the grid.
You can claim lower down patterns and be correct. Claiming that an x-wing is a jellyfish is just absurd. IMHO. 
Last edited by wapati on Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:58 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
