View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
George Woods
Joined: 28 Mar 2006 Posts: 304 Location: Dorset UK
|
Posted: Sun Aug 06, 2006 5:27 pm Post subject: sat 5th very hard |
|
|
Always looking for the more direct route I wonder is there a better one?
After some fairly mundane entries I reached r7c5 which might be 1 5 or 8
An X wing in r48c35 denies a 1 in this position
The 5 is denied by a bit of reasoning that may not have a formal description.
To leave a position for 5 in col 1 there must be a 5 in either c5 row 2 or 8
So a 5 in col 5 at either r3 or 7 denies this
Hence r7c5 is 8 and so on to a solution.
So what is the better solution?
the crunch point to which above refers is
018 020 075
702 106 049
009 000 100
920 005 006
040 060 250
800 200 091
070 000 900
290 304 007
080 090 510 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David Bryant
Joined: 29 Jul 2005 Posts: 559 Location: Denver, Colorado
|
Posted: Sun Aug 06, 2006 6:54 pm Post subject: X-Wing on "5" |
|
|
George --
There's another X-Wing -- on "5"s -- in columns 1 & 4 (and in rows 3 & 7, specifically), which eliminates the "5" at r7c5. dcb |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Blas
Joined: 19 Jul 2005 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 6:41 am Post subject: Sat 5th Aug puzzle continued |
|
|
Being very dim, I cannot get the 5 in r1c9, which George Woods found. George - how did you get it, please? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TKiel
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 292 Location: Kalamazoo, MI
|
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 12:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Blas,
After playing the 5 singles at the start of the puzzle, that leaves a naked pair in box 6. After making those exclusions from the rest of that box, the only 3's remaining in column 7 lie in box 3, which means all other 3's in that box can be excluded. This leaves r1c9 with only 5 as a candidate. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Blas
Joined: 19 Jul 2005 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 5:18 pm Post subject: Sat puzzle |
|
|
I can NOT believe it; I really must get my eyes tested; what a prat I am. Many thanks, Tracy. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|