View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
kragzy
Joined: 01 May 2007 Posts: 112 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:10 am Post subject: Jan 21 Just for Interest |
|
|
I reached this point and couldn't work out what I was missing:
Code: |
+-----------------+-------------+-----------------+
| 246 2469 2469 | 3 289 14 | 7 1259 1589 |
| 3 1 8 | 29 7 5 | 26 2469 49 |
| 5 7 249 | 6 289 14 | 238 129 1389 |
+-----------------+-------------+-----------------+
| 2467 23469 5 | 8 1249 67 | 36 1679 139 |
| 1 34689 469 | 59 49 67 | 3568 5679 2 |
| 2678 2689 269 | 259 129 3 | 4 15679 1589 |
+-----------------+-------------+-----------------+
| 24 24 1 | 7 5 8 | 9 3 6 |
| 9 5 3 | 4 6 2 | 1 8 7 |
| 68 68 7 | 1 3 9 | 25 245 45 |
+-----------------+-------------+-----------------+
|
Eventually I spotted the hidden pair in R5. No doubt others saw it straight away.
Thought I'd post this just in case someone else gets stuck at this point, and also for the simple pleasure of posting a "non VH" thread!!
Cheers |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ravel
Joined: 21 Apr 2006 Posts: 536
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hidden pairs often can be spotted easier without pencilmarks.
Code: | +-------+-------+-------+
| . . . | 3 . . | 7 . . |
| 3 1<8>| . 7 5 | . . . |
| 5 7 . | 6 . . | . . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . 5 |<8>. . | . . . |
| 1 . x | x x x | . x 2 |
| . . . | . .<3>| 4 . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . 1 | 7 5 8 | 9<3>6 |
| 9 5<3>| 4 6 2 | 1<8>7 |
| . . 7 | 1 3 9 | . . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
|
Some samples:
This puzzle can be solved with singles and 2 easy-to-spot hidden pairs (but looks hard with full pencilmarks).
Code: | +-------+-------+-------+
| . 1 . | . . . | . . . |
| . . 6 | . . . | . . . |
| . 2 . | 8 . . | 4 3 . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . . | 5 . 9 | . . 6 |
| . 3 . | 7 . 8 | . . . |
| . . 4 | . . . | 2 8 . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| 5 4 . | . . . | . . 1 |
| . . . | . . 3 | . . 2 |
| . . . | . . . | 6 9 . |
+-------+-------+-------+ | >>> play online
Here are 3 hidden pairs in the grid. The two with same numbers are not hard to spot:
Code: | +-------+-------+-------+
| . . 1 | 2 . . | . 3 . |
| . . 4 | 5 . 6 | . . 1 |
| 6 5 . | 1 . . | . . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| 7 8 6 | . . . | . 5 . |
| . . . | . . . | . . . |
| . 4 . | . . . | 3 6 8 |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . . | . . 2 | . 7 3 |
| 2 . . | 3 . 9 | 8 . . |
| . 6 . | . . 1 | 2 . . |
+-------+-------+-------+ (JPF) | >>> play online
Here even 2 hidden triples are not hard to spot (and 2 hidden pairs)
Code: | +-------+-------+-------+
| . . . | . . . | . . . |
| . 1 . | 2 3 4 | . 5 . |
| . . 6 | . . . | 1 . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . 4 . | 5 . 2 | . 1 . |
| . 7 . | . . . | . 2 . |
| . 3 . | 1 . 8 | . 6 . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . 7 | . . . | 4 . . |
| . 2 . | 6 9 5 | . 7 . |
| . . . | . . . | . . . |
+-------+-------+-------+ (JPF) | >>> play online
[Edit:]Added play online links. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sdq_pete
Joined: 30 Apr 2007 Posts: 119 Location: Rotterdam, NL
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | No doubt others saw it straight away |
It certainly took me quite some time to spot the 38 hidden pair. I was "reduced" to systematically scanning for anything occurring twice or three times and then checking if perchance it had a companion. The 38 then inevitably arose. But I certainly would never have spotted it just by staring at the puzzle hoping for inspiration.
Peter |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kragzy
Joined: 01 May 2007 Posts: 112 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
It was the 45679 quintuplet in R5 that I saw first. I mostly seem to see the bigger sets before the smaller; don't know why, just a wierd quirk of my twisted logic. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sheryl
Joined: 24 Sep 2007 Posts: 64 Location: New York
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:14 am Post subject: hidden pair |
|
|
Kragzy, thank you thank you. i've been looking at this puzzle for quite a while and just didn't see anything until you said the magic words "hidden pair in r5"! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
kragzy wrote: | It was the 45679 quintuplet in R5 that I saw first. I mostly seem to see the bigger sets before the smaller; don't know why, just a wierd quirk of my twisted logic. |
Just yesterday I wrote the following in another thread:
"In my 2+ years, I've never found a hidden anything bigger than a single. I'll take a naked quint over a hidden pair anytime." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|