View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 3:59 pm Post subject: No XY/XYZ-Wings: Set A Puzzle 7 |
|
|
Same Rules!
This puzzle may not qualify as fun. Unlike the previous puzzles, the XY-Wings are numerous and some occur early.
Code: | +-----------------------+
| . . . | 7 . . | 2 . . |
| . 4 . | . . . | . . 9 |
| . . 2 | . . . | 8 7 3 |
|-------+-------+-------|
| 9 . . | 5 . . | . . . |
| . . . | . 6 . | 9 8 . |
| . . . | . . 7 | . 6 . |
|-------+-------+-------|
| 1 . 7 | . 4 . | . 2 8 |
| . . 9 | . 7 2 | 1 . . |
| . 2 5 | . . . | 4 . . |
+-----------------------+
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Asellus
Joined: 05 Jun 2007 Posts: 865 Location: Sonoma County, CA, USA
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, we can just resort to some larger ALS:
[1] (1=5)r2c8 - (5)r8c8=(5)r8c9 - ALS[(5)r56c9=(1)r456c9]; r1c9|r4c8<>1
[2] (3=6)r7c7 - (6=5)r2c7 - ALS[(5)r12c8=(3)r4c8]; r6c7|r8c8<>3
After quite a bit of simplification...
[3] X-Wing on 3
[4] BUG+1 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
storm_norm
Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 1741
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 10:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Asellus,
very surprised you didn't see your own move
Code: | .------------------------.------------------------.------------------------.
| 3568 135689 1368 | 7 1358 13689 | 2 145 1456 |
| 7 4 1368 | 12368 12358 1368 |*56 15 9 |
| 56 1569 2 | 146 15 1469 | 8 7 3 |
:------------------------+------------------------+------------------------:
| 9 1368 13468 | 5 1238 1348 | 7 134 124 |
| 235 7 134 | 1234 6 134 | 9 8 *1245 |
| 2358 1358 1348 | 12348 9 7 |*35 6 *1245 |
:------------------------+------------------------+------------------------:
| 1 36 7 | 9 4 5 |3-6 2 8 |
| 4 368 9 | 368 7 2 | 1 35 *56 |
| 368 2 5 | 1368 138 1368 | 4 9 7 |
'------------------------'------------------------'------------------------' |
the w-wing with grouped strong link
leads to x-wing on 3, leads to BUG 8 in r6c2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 10:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quite simple, actually.
After basics:
Code: | +----------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| 3568 135689 1368 | 7 1358 13689 | 2 145 1456 |
| 7 4 1368 | 12368 12358 1368 | 56 15 9 |
| 56 1569 2 | 146 15 1469 | 8 7 3 |
+----------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| 9 1368 13468 | 5 1238 1348 | 7 134 124 |
| 235 7 134 | 1234 6 134 | 9 8 124-5 |
| 2358 1358 1348 | 12348 9 7 | 35a 6 124-5 |
+----------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
| 1 36 7 | 9 4 5 | 36b 2 8 |
| 4 368 9 | 368 7 2 | 1 35c 56d |
| 368 2 5 | 1368 138 1368 | 4 9 7 |
+----------------------+----------------------+----------------------+ |
An M-wing abcd takes out <5> in R56C9. After a lot of simplification, a classic remote pair on <38> solves it.
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 10:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Norm: A different grouped strong link ... and the second elimination.
Code: | after basics
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| 3568 13589 138 | 7 1358 13689 | 2 #145 145-6 |
| 7 4 1368 | 12368 12358 1368 | *56 #15 9 |
| 56 1569 2 | 146 15 1469 | 8 7 3 |
|-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------|
| 9 16 13468 | 5 1238 1348 | 7 134 124 |
| 235 7 134 | 1234 6 134 | 9 8 1245 |
| 2358 1358 1348 | 12348 9 7 | 35 6 1245 |
|-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------|
| 1 36 7 | 9 4 5 | 3-6 2 8 |
| 4 368 9 | 368 7 2 | 1 #35 *56 |
| 368 2 5 | 1368 138 1368 | 4 9 7 |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
# 109 eliminations remain
|
Code: | [r2c7]<>6 [r2c7]=5 [r12c8]<>5 [r8c8]=5 [r8c9]<>5 [r8c9]=6 => [r1c9],[r7c7]<>6
ER (or) finned X-Wing r68\c24 => [r4c2]<>8
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
storm_norm
Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 1741
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 10:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
daj, nice to meet ya
I see it.
didn't notice that second elmination up on the 6 in r1c9.
I was getting on Asellus and you got on me.
oh well.
I guess I will have to get on you sometime.
and again, nice to meet ya. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
storm_norm wrote: | I guess I will have to get on you sometime.
and again, nice to meet ya. |
Nice to meet you as well, Norm. I'll be looking forward to your getting even. Since I have dyslexia of the fingers (for typing) and swiss cheese for memory recall, you should have lots of opportunities. I'll be waiting with a
Danny A. Jones |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Asellus
Joined: 05 Jun 2007 Posts: 865 Location: Sonoma County, CA, USA
|
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 2:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Norm wrote: | very surprised you didn't see your own move |
I claim no ownership. I avoided focusing on bivalues because doing so kept slipping into XY-Wings in disguise. (I rejected Keith's M-Wing for that reason since I saw it as just the 356 XY-Wing wearing a 35 bivalue moustache.) There's no way to see your W-Wing as an XY(Z)-Wing, so congrats!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|