View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
wapati
Joined: 10 Jun 2008 Posts: 472 Location: Brampton, Ontario, Canada.
|
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 4:22 pm Post subject: FP February 13th |
|
|
Easier than most of the Friday puzzles.
Code: | . 8 3|4 . 2|. 1 .
5 . .|. . .|. 9 .
. . .|1 . 5|3 . .
-----+-----+-----
. 7 .|. . .|. . 5
1 . .|. . .|. . 9
2 . .|. . .|. 4 .
-----+-----+-----
. . 4|. . 1|. . .
. 1 .|. . .|9 . 8
. 3 .|8 . 7|1 6 . |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
storm_norm
Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 1741
|
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 6:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Code: | .---------------.---------------.---------------.
| 67 8 3 | 4 9 2 | 5 1 67 |
| 5 2 1 | 37 8 36 | 4 9 67 |
| 4 9 67 | 1 67 5 | 3 8 2 |
:---------------+---------------+---------------:
| 3 7 9 | 6 1 4 | 8 2 5 |
| 1 4 *56 |*257 2-7* 8 | 67 3 9 |
| 2 56 8 |*57 3 9 | 67 4 1 |
:---------------+---------------+---------------:
| 8 56 4 | 9 56 1 | 2 7 3 |
| 67 1 267 | 23 4 36 | 9 5 8 |
| 9 3 *25 | 8 *25 7 | 1 6 4 |
'---------------'---------------'---------------' |
Quote: | its still a nice puzzle
surprising no xy-wings are present with so many bi-value cells.
(7=5)r6c4 - (5)r5c4 = (5)r5c3 - (5=2)r9c3 - (2)r9c5 = (2)r5c5; r5c5 <> 7 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ronk
Joined: 07 May 2006 Posts: 398
|
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 6:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | BUG+2: (7)r5c4 = (6)r8c3 - (6=3)r8c6 - (3=2)r8c4 ==> r5c4<>2 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I used coloring to make an elimination in R8C3, reducing it it to a BUG+1 in R5C4.
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 1:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="storm_norm"] Code: | .---------------.---------------.---------------.
| 67 8 3 | 4 9 2 | 5 1 67 |
| 5 2 1 | 37 8 36 | 4 9 67 |
| 4 9 67 | 1 67 5 | 3 8 2 |
:---------------+---------------+---------------:
| 3 7 9 | 6 1 4 | 8 2 5 |
| 1 4 *56 |*257 2-7* 8 | 67 3 9 |
| 2 56 8 |*57 3 9 | 67 4 1 |
:---------------+---------------+---------------:
| 8 56 4 | 9 56 1 | 2 7 3 |
| 67 1 267 | 23 4 36 | 9 5 8 |
| 9 3 *25 | 8 *25 7 | 1 6 4 |
'---------------'---------------'---------------' |
Quote: |
surprising no xy-wings are present with so many bi-value cells.
|
Actually, a useless xy-wing exists on <257> with pivot <27> at r5c5 and pincers <57> at r6c4 and <25> at r9c5. Transporting the <5> from r9c5 to r7c2 via r9c3 deletes the <5> at r6c2 and completes the puzzle.
Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 1:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Actually, a useless xy-wing exists on <257> with pivot <27> at r5c5 and pincers <57> at r6c4 and <25> at r9c5. Transporting the <5> from r9c5 to r7c2 via r9c3 deletes the <5> at r6c2 and completes the puzzle. |
OK, time for the language police to check in. "Useless"? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 2:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Marty R. wrote: | Quote: | Actually, a useless xy-wing exists on <257> with pivot <27> at r5c5 and pincers <57> at r6c4 and <25> at r9c5. Transporting the <5> from r9c5 to r7c2 via r9c3 deletes the <5> at r6c2 and completes the puzzle. |
OK, time for the language police to check in. "Useless"? |
So, terminology always seems to be the biggest problem when we describe how we solve these puzzles. In this case, I thought I was using a term previously used by other members to indicate a condition were the original pattern did not provide a deletion but transportation, extension or coloring did.
I agree it is a funny use of the term, and would be happy to use a different one. What do you suggest?
Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 2:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
tlanglet wrote: | Marty R. wrote: | Quote: | Actually, a useless xy-wing exists on <257> with pivot <27> at r5c5 and pincers <57> at r6c4 and <25> at r9c5. Transporting the <5> from r9c5 to r7c2 via r9c3 deletes the <5> at r6c2 and completes the puzzle. |
OK, time for the language police to check in. "Useless"? |
So, terminology always seems to be the biggest problem when we describe how we solve these puzzles. In this case, I thought I was using a term previously used by other members to indicate a condition were the original pattern did not provide a deletion but transportation, extension or coloring did.
I agree it is a funny use of the term, and would be happy to use a different one. What do you suggest?
Ted |
Well, of course, I was just yankin' your chain. However, when the wing's original pincers eliminate nothing, I've seen them referred to as "flightlesss." But I'm not necessarily suggesting that you use that. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 3:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
I prefer a PM.
Code: | XY-Wing a-b-c w/transport d-e => [r6c2]<>5 -or-
XY-Wing a-b-c w/transport D-e => [r6c2]<>5 -or-
XY-Chain a-b-c- D-e => [r6c2]<>5
*---------------------------------------------------*
| 67 8 3 | 4 9 2 | 5 1 67 |
| 5 2 1 | 37 8 36 | 4 9 67 |
| 4 9 67 | 1 67 5 | 3 8 2 |
|----------------+-----------------+----------------|
| 3 7 9 | 6 1 4 | 8 2 5 |
| 1 4 56 | 257 b27 8 | 67 3 9 |
| 2 6-5 8 | a57 3 9 | 67 4 1 |
|----------------+-----------------+----------------|
| 8 e56 4 | 9 D56 1 | 2 7 3 |
| 67 1 267 | 23 4 36 | 9 5 8 |
| 9 3 d25 | 8 c25 7 | 1 6 4 |
*---------------------------------------------------*
|
Last edited by daj95376 on Sat Feb 14, 2009 3:12 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wapati
Joined: 10 Jun 2008 Posts: 472 Location: Brampton, Ontario, Canada.
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 3:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
A single W-wing does it, too.
Code: | .---------------.---------------.---------------.
| 67 8 3 | 4 9 2 | 5 1 67 |
| 5 2 1 | 37 8 36 | 4 9 67 |
| 4 9 #67 | 1 *67 5 | 3 8 2 |
:---------------+---------------+---------------:
| 3 7 9 | 6 1 4 | 8 2 5 |
| 1 4 5-6 | 257 *27 8 |#67 3 9 |
| 2 56 8 | 57 3 9 | 67 4 1 |
:---------------+---------------+---------------:
| 8 56 4 | 9 56 1 | 2 7 3 |
| 67 1 267 | 23 4 36 | 9 5 8 |
| 9 3 25 | 8 25 7 | 1 6 4 |
'---------------'---------------'---------------' |
Last edited by wapati on Sat Feb 14, 2009 1:17 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
storm_norm
Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 1741
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2009 7:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
wapati wrote: | A single W-wing does it, too. |
I see an extended W-wing that does it,
and a M-wing {2,5} which has those sultry solving eyes.
happy v-day everyone. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|