View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 12:58 am Post subject: A Grouped M-wing |
|
|
Code: | Puzzle: M3886622sh(11)
+-------+-------+-------+
| 7 . 9 | . . . | 3 . 4 |
| 2 . . | 6 . . | . . 7 |
| . 5 . | 9 . . | . 8 . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . . | 3 9 . | . . . |
| . . . | 1 . 2 | . . . |
| 9 3 . | . 5 6 | . 1 2 |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . 2 . | . . 9 | . 7 . |
| 5 . . | . . 4 | . . 1 |
| 8 . 7 | . . . | 9 . 3 |
+-------+-------+-------+ |
After basics: Code: | +----------------+----------------+----------------+
| 7 6 9 | 258 128 158 | 3 25 4 |
| 2 8 13 | 6 4 35 | 15 9 7 |
| 134 5 134 | 9 27 37 | 12 8 6 |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| 146 147 2 | 3 9 78 | 4568 456b 58 |
| 46 47 5 | 1 78 2 | 468 3 9 |
| 9 3 8 | 4 5 6 | 7 1 2 |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| 134 2 1346 | 58 136 9 | 46a 7 58 |
| 5 9 36 | 7 2368 4 | 2-68 26c 1 |
| 8 14 7 | 25 126 15 | 9 2456d 3 |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+ |
If a is 4, b is 4.
If b is not 6, one of cd is 6. a and cd are pincers on 6, making the elimination of 6 in R8C7.
Not that this helps very much!
My question is, this looks like a cycle. Are there other eliminations to be made in this grouped chain / loop?
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:27 am Post subject: Re: A Grouped M-wing |
|
|
keith wrote: | My question is, this looks like a cycle. Are there other eliminations to be made in this grouped chain / loop?
|
I believe the weak inference in [r4c8] also results in an elimination.
Code: | (6=4)r7c7 - (4)r45c7 = (4-6)r4c8 = (6)r89c8 - loop => r4c8<>5, r8c7<>6
|
[Edit: corrected one typo. Thanks Mogulmeister! Then caught another typo as well.]
Last edited by daj95376 on Tue Jul 06, 2010 4:38 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mogulmeister
Joined: 03 May 2007 Posts: 1151
|
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Did you mean r7c7 at the start of that chain Danny ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ronk
Joined: 07 May 2006 Posts: 398
|
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:55 am Post subject: Re: A Grouped M-wing |
|
|
daj95376 wrote: | keith wrote: | My question is, this looks like a cycle. Are there other eliminations to be made in this grouped chain / loop?
|
I believe the weak inference in [r4c8] also results in an elimination.
Code: | (6=4)r7c8 - (4)r4c7 = (4-6)r4c8 = (6)r89c8 - loop => r4c8<>5, r8c7<>6
|
|
Four different m-rings exist simultaneously, all resulting in r4c8=46, r8c7<>6.
(6=4)r7c7 - (4)r789c8 = (4-6)r4c8 = (6)r456c7 - loop
(4=6)r7c7 - (6)r789c8 = (6-4)r4c8 = (4)r456c7 - loop
(4=6)r7c7 - (6)r789c8 = (6-4)r4c8 = (4)r789c8 - loop
(4=6)r7c7 - (6)r456c7 = (6-4)r4c8 = (4)r456c7 - loop
All possible candidate positions are listed. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 5:02 pm Post subject: Re: A Grouped M-wing |
|
|
ronk wrote: | Four different m-rings exist simultaneously, all resulting in r4c8=46, r8c7<>6.
(6=4)r7c7 - (4)r789c8 = (4-6)r4c8 = (6)r456c7 - loop
(4=6)r7c7 - (6)r789c8 = (6-4)r4c8 = (4)r456c7 - loop
(4=6)r7c7 - (6)r789c8 = (6-4)r4c8 = (4)r789c8 - loop
(4=6)r7c7 - (6)r456c7 = (6-4)r4c8 = (4)r456c7 - loop
All possible candidate positions are listed. |
I believe your r4c8=46 is equivalent to my r4c8<>5. That only leaves the question of how many M-Rings exist.
(Exact candidate positions are listed.)
Code: | Loop B (4=6)r7c7 - r45c7 = (6-4)r4c8 = (4)r9c8 - loop => r4c8<>5, r8c7<>6
Loop B (4=6)r7c7 - r89c8 = (6-4)r4c8 = (4)r45c7 - loop => r4c8<>5, r8c7<>6
Loop C (4=6)r7c7 - r89c8 = (6-4)r4c8 = (4)r9c8 - loop => r4c8<>5, r8c7<>6
Loop D (4=6)r7c7 - r45c7 = (6-4)r4c8 = (4)r45c7 - loop => r4c8<>5, r8c7<>6
Loop B (6=4)r7c7 - r45c7 = (4-6)r4c8 = (6)r89c8 - loop => r4c8<>5, r8c7<>6
Loop B (6=4)r7c7 - r9c8 = (4-6)r4c8 = (6)r45c7 - loop => r4c8<>5, r8c7<>6
Loop C (6=4)r7c7 - r9c8 = (4-6)r4c8 = (6)r89c8 - loop => r4c8<>5, r8c7<>6
Loop D (6=4)r7c7 - r45c7 = (4-6)r4c8 = (6)r45c7 - loop => r4c8<>5, r8c7<>6
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ronk
Joined: 07 May 2006 Posts: 398
|
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 5:12 pm Post subject: Re: A Grouped M-wing |
|
|
daj95376 wrote: | That only leaves the question of how many M-Rings exist.
Code: | Loop B (4=6)r7c7 - r45c7 = (6-4)r4c8 = (4)r9c8 - loop => r4c8<>5, r8c7<>6
Loop B (4=6)r7c7 - r89c8 = (6-4)r4c8 = (4)r45c7 - loop => r4c8<>5, r8c7<>6
Loop C (4=6)r7c7 - r89c8 = (6-4)r4c8 = (4)r9c8 - loop => r4c8<>5, r8c7<>6
Loop D (4=6)r7c7 - r45c7 = (6-4)r4c8 = (4)r45c7 - loop => r4c8<>5, r8c7<>6
Loop B (6=4)r7c7 - r45c7 = (4-6)r4c8 = (6)r89c8 - loop => r4c8<>5, r8c7<>6
Loop B (6=4)r7c7 - r9c8 = (4-6)r4c8 = (6)r45c7 - loop => r4c8<>5, r8c7<>6
Loop C (6=4)r7c7 - r9c8 = (4-6)r4c8 = (6)r89c8 - loop => r4c8<>5, r8c7<>6
Loop D (6=4)r7c7 - r45c7 = (4-6)r4c8 = (6)r45c7 - loop => r4c8<>5, r8c7<>6
|
|
Traversing a loop in two directions doesn't mean there are two loops. The first "loop B" and the fourth "loop B" are for the same loop. Ditto for three other pairs.
daj95376 wrote: | I believe your r4c8=46 is equivalent to my r4c8<>5. |
It is. I prefer the "bivalue assignment" notation because it can be deduced from the chain expression without reference to pencilmarks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 5:42 pm Post subject: Re: A Grouped M-wing |
|
|
ronk wrote: | Traversing a loop in two directions doesn't mean there are two loops. The first "loop B" and the fourth "loop B" are for the same loop. Ditto for three other pairs.
|
Excellent point! Normally, my chain() sorts out chains/loops with duplicate results; however, I have a special version of chain() that captures and lists all M-Wings, M-Rings, and W-Wings that it encounters. I missed the fact that the M-Rings would be listed twice because of the "loop". Thanks!
BTW: I just recently added your classifications to my output. Do you agree with the labels I attached to the first four loops?
Regards, Danny |
|
Back to top |
|
|
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Wed Jul 07, 2010 12:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Note:
The letter next to "Loop" is from a classification/categorization that ronk created for M-Wings and M-Rings in the Players' Forum. They are not sequence designators.
Regards, Danny |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|