View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 5:22 am Post subject: Puzzle 10/08/18: B |
|
|
Code: | +-----------------------+
| 1 . 6 | . 3 . | . . . |
| . 7 4 | 2 8 . | . . 5 |
| 2 . . | . 6 . | . . . |
|-------+-------+-------|
| . 1 . | 4 . . | 2 . . |
| . 2 5 | . . . | . . 4 |
| . . . | . . . | . . . |
|-------+-------+-------|
| . . . | 5 . . | . 6 8 |
| 5 . . | . . . | 1 . . |
| . 3 . | 8 4 6 | 7 . . |
+-----------------------+
|
Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterj
Joined: 26 Mar 2010 Posts: 974 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 8:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
A nice one-step wing...
Quote: | m-wing(19) (9=1)r2c6 - r7c6=(1-9)r7c5=r5c5 ; r45c6<>9 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
JC Van Hay
Joined: 13 Jun 2010 Posts: 494 Location: Charleroi, Belgium
|
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 10:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Not as elegant as Peter's proof ...
Quote: | X Wing (9) : => r7c6<>9
XY Wing (31-9) : => r1c4<>9 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 1:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Another one step solution.........
Quote: | Type 1 BUG-lite (458)r13c267 forces r3c7=3 |
Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 12:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not familiar with Ted's Type 1 Bug Lite terminology, but maybe mine was the same thing since it made the same elimination.
There was a potential DP in boxes 123, 58-58-45-45-48-348. The 3 must be played to avoid the DP. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 12:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Marty R. wrote: | I'm not familiar with Ted's Type 1 Bug Lite terminology, but maybe mine was the same thing since it made the same elimination.
There was a potential DP in boxes 123, 58-58-45-45-48-348. The 3 must be played to avoid the DP. |
Marty, I have to admit that I am not sure about the " Type 1" label, for a BUG_lite. In any case we found the same pattern & deletion.
Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|