View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:34 am Post subject: Puzzle 10/09/02: C |
|
|
Code: | +-----------------------+
| . . . | . . 9 | . 6 5 |
| . 8 . | . . . | 9 . . |
| . 7 4 | . . 5 | . . . |
|-------+-------+-------|
| . . . | 9 . . | 1 . 7 |
| . . . | . . 3 | 4 . . |
| 5 2 . | . 4 . | . 9 . |
|-------+-------+-------|
| . 5 . | . 8 . | . . . |
| 1 . . | . . 4 | . . . |
| 4 3 . | 1 . . | . . . |
+-----------------------+
|
Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JC Van Hay
Joined: 13 Jun 2010 Posts: 494 Location: Charleroi, Belgium
|
Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 11:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | 5-SIS M Wing loop (13) : 1C5 3C5 3C8 3R6 1C3 loop : r2c5<>2,r8c479<>3,r6c3<>67
4-SIS AIC : 1C3 7R5 8C1 8C6 : (1)r6c3=(8)r6c6 : => r6c6<>1
XY Wing (36-2), pivot at R6C7 : => r3c9<>2 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
JC Van Hay
Joined: 13 Jun 2010 Posts: 494 Location: Charleroi, Belgium
|
Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Second run ...
Quote: | I cannot resist a continuous loop ... But as the 2 1st steps in the previous proof have essentially the cell R6C3 as a target, it appears that the elimination of (3)r6c3 is done through a very simple 3-SIS step that conveniently replace them.
An alternative proof :
XY Wing Style : (38)R4C1 8C6 1R6 : (3)r4c1=(1)r6c3 : r6c3<>3
XY Wing (36-2), pivot at R6C7 : => r3c9<>2
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2010 4:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
The DP killers of the potential 28 DP in boxes 79 yielded some common eliminations. Following that, the 28 became a Type 1 UR followed by a BUG+2. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|