View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 4:46 am Post subject: Puzzle 11/02/20 Difficult/Extreme |
|
|
Code: | +-----------------------+
| . 6 . | . . 4 | . . . |
| 5 3 4 | . . 6 | . . 2 |
| . 2 9 | . . 5 | 1 . 4 |
|-------+-------+-------|
| . . . | 5 . . | . 1 . |
| . . . | . . 8 | . . 5 |
| 4 5 3 | . 1 2 | . . . |
|-------+-------+-------|
| . . 1 | . . . | . 4 7 |
| . . . | 4 . . | 8 2 . |
| . 4 2 | . 7 . | 5 . . |
+-----------------------+
|
Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 3:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here is an "almost" naked pair (ANP) with an "almost" xy-chain. How is this properly described?
Code: | *-----------------------------------------------------------*
| 1 6 78 | 79 2 4 | 39 5 389 |
| 5 3 4 | 1 89 6 | 79 78 2 |
| 78 2 9 | 37 38 5 | 1 6 4 |
|-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
|#289 #89 6-8 | 5 (34=9) 7 | 24 1 369 |
| 279 1 67 | 369 349 8 | 24 39 5 |
| 4 5 3 | 69 1 2 | 679 78 689 |
|-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
| 3689 89 1 | 2 5 39 | 369 4 7 |
| 39 7 5 | 4 6 139 | 8 2 139 |
| 369 4 2 | 8 7 139 | 5 39 1369 |
*-----------------------------------------------------------* |
The key is the 349 in r4c5; view it as r4c5=34 or r4c5=9
If r4c5=34 then: ANP(89=2)r4c12-(2=4)r4c7-(4=3)r4c5-(3=8)r3c5-r3c1=(8)r1c3; r4c3<>8
If r4c5=9 then: (9)r4c5-(9=8)r4c2; r4c3<>8
Comments..........
Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
|
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 4:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You could use a network notation:
Code: | ANP(89=2)r4c12-(2=4)r4c7-(4=3)r4c5-(3=8)r3c5-r3c1=(8)r1c3; r4c3<>8
||
-(4=9)r4c5-(9=8)r4c2; r4c3<>8
|
In the past, I would have used this network notation:
Code: | (4=3)r4c5-(3=8)r3c5-r3c1=(8)r1c3
/ \
ANP(89=2)r4c12-(2=4)r4c7- => r4c3<>8
\ /
(4=9)r4c5-(9=8)r4c2
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterj
Joined: 26 Mar 2010 Posts: 974 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 4:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A simple wing - but with a killer transport!
Code: | xyz-wing(36-9) r5c4 transport -(9)r5c1=r4c12 ; r45c5<>9 |
Ted,
Quote: | The key is the 349 in r4c5 | ... as you say, isn't it really a kraken cell at heart?
Code: | kraken-cell(349) r4c5
(3)r4c5 - (3=8)r3c5 - r3c1=r1c3
||
(4)r4c5 - (4=2)r3c7 - (2=89)r3c12
||
(9)r4c5 - (9=8)r4c2 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterj wrote: | A simple wing - but with a killer transport!
Code: | xyz-wing(36-9) r5c4 transport -(9)r5c1=r4c12 ; r45c5<>9 |
|
Nice use of multiple eliminations along a chain. I tried to find a way of explicitly expressing it. However, I had to alter your logic a bit.
(9=6)r6c4 - (6=39)r5c48 - (9)r5c5,r5c1 = (9)r4c12; r4c5<>9 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterj
Joined: 26 Mar 2010 Posts: 974 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 6:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
daj95376 wrote: | I tried to find a way of explicitly expressing it. |
Why not just?
Code: | (96=3)r65c4 - (3=9)r5c8* - r5c1=r4c12 ; *r5c5<>9, r4c5<>9 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 11:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
XY-Chain running from r2c5 to r4c2; r4c5<>9
XYZ-Wing (369); r5c5<>9 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|