View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
arkietech
Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 1834 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 6:23 am Post subject: Vanhegan extreme June 24, 2012 |
|
|
Code: |
*-----------*
|..8|2.3|5..|
|9..|568|..4|
|...|...|...|
|---+---+---|
|2..|935|..7|
|..3|.8.|9..|
|6..|127|..8|
|---+---+---|
|...|...|...|
|1..|742|..9|
|..4|8.1|2..|
*-----------*
|
Play/Print online |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Code after basics:
Code: | *-----------------------------------------------------------------------------*
| 4 167 8 | 2 17 3 | 5 9 16 |
| 9 1237 27 | 5 6 8 | 17 1237 4 |
| 357 123567 56 | 4 17 9 | 1678 123678 1236 |
|-------------------------+-------------------------+-------------------------|
| 2 8 1 | 9 3 5 | 46 46 7 |
| 57 57 3 | 6 8 4 | 9 12 12 |
| 6 4 9 | 1 2 7 | 3 5 8 |
|-------------------------+-------------------------+-------------------------|
| 8 279 27 | 3 59 6 | 147 147 15 |
| 1 356 56 | 7 4 2 | 68 368 9 |
| 37 3679 4 | 8 59 1 | 2 367 356 |
*-----------------------------------------------------------------------------*
|
Lots of AUR possibilities but I could not find anything really useful.
I did find a two step solution that used similar logic but was unable to combine into a one stepper.........
(2=1)r5c9-(1=5)r7c9-(59=27)r7c523-(7=3)r9c1-r9c9=(3)r3c9; r3c9<>2
ant(156=*3)r179c9-(3=7)r9c1-r7c3=r2c3-(7=*1)r2c7-(1=*6)r1c9-(136*=2)r3c9; r3c9<>16
Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SudoQ
Joined: 02 Aug 2011 Posts: 127
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 1:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A one stepper: Code: | |-----------------|----------|--------------------|
| 4 167 8 | 2 17 3 | 5 9 16 |
| 9 1237 27 | 5 6 8 | 17 1237 4 |
| 357 123567 56 | 4 17 9 | 1678 123678 1236 |
|-----------------|----------|--------------------|
| 2 8 1 | 9 3 5 | 46 46 7 |
| 57 57 3 | 6 8 4 | 9 12 12 |
| 6 4 9 | 1 2 7 | 3 5 8 |
|-----------------|----------|--------------------|
| 8 (279) (27)| 3 (59) 6 | 147 147 (5)1 |
| 1 356 56 | 7 4 2 | 68 368 9 |
|(37) 3679 4 | 8 59 1 | 2 367 (5)6-3 |
|-----------------|----------|--------------------|
r7c2=2 -> r7c3=7 -> r9c1=3
=7 -> -> r9c1=3
=9 -> r7c5=5 -> r9c9=5 => r9c9<>3 |
/SudoQ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 1:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SudoQ wrote: | A one stepper: Code: |
r7c2=2 -> r7c3=7 -> r9c1=3
=7 -> -> r9c1=3
=9 -> r7c5=5 -> r9c9=5 => r9c9<>3 |
/SudoQ |
Nice
I looked at the anp(27=9)r7c32 but missed the deletion in r9c9; my bad.
Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
|
arkietech
Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 1834 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Code: | *-----------------------------------------------------------------------------*
| 4 167 8 | 2 17 3 | 5 9 c16 |
| 9 1237 27 | 5 6 8 | 17 1237 4 |
| 57-3 123567 56 | 4 17 9 | 1678 123678 c1236 |
|-------------------------+-------------------------+-------------------------|
| 2 8 1 | 9 3 5 | 46 46 7 |
| 57 57 3 | 6 8 4 | 9 12 c12 |
| 6 4 9 | 1 2 7 | 3 5 8 |
|-------------------------+-------------------------+-------------------------|
| 8 b279 b27 | 3 b59 6 | 147 147 c15 |
| 1 356 56 | 7 4 2 | 68 368 9 |
|a37 3679 4 | 8 59 1 | 2 367 56-3 |
*-----------------------------------------------------------------------------*
(3=7)r9c1-(729=5)r7c235-(5126=3)r1357c9 -3r3c1,r9c9; stte
either r9c1 or r3c9 = 3
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 1:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
I played the X-Wing on 3 (perhaps not useful) and two AICs, one originating in r7c9 which eliminated some 1s and the other starting in r2c3 which eliminated some 7s. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aran
Joined: 19 Apr 2010 Posts: 70
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 12:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
arkietech wrote: | Code: | *-----------------------------------------------------------------------------*
| 4 167 8 | 2 17 3 | 5 9 c16 |
| 9 1237 27 | 5 6 8 | 17 1237 4 |
| 57-3 123567 56 | 4 17 9 | 1678 123678 c1236 |
|-------------------------+-------------------------+-------------------------|
| 2 8 1 | 9 3 5 | 46 46 7 |
| 57 57 3 | 6 8 4 | 9 12 c12 |
| 6 4 9 | 1 2 7 | 3 5 8 |
|-------------------------+-------------------------+-------------------------|
| 8 b279 b27 | 3 b59 6 | 147 147 c15 |
| 1 356 56 | 7 4 2 | 68 368 9 |
|a37 3679 4 | 8 59 1 | 2 367 56-3 |
*-----------------------------------------------------------------------------*
(3=7)r9c1-(729=5)r7c235-(5126=3)r1357c9 -3r3c1,r9c9
|
|
arkietech's move could be seen as an example of "extended" ALS x-z
(to illustrate, 4 candidate ALS are used but number is of course irrelevant)
(and using as standard notation : restricted commons in bold and opposite, z-candidate at start and finish of relevant sets)
If then ALS x-z is this
{zabc} {cdez}
then extended ALS x-z is
{zabc} {cdef} {fghz}
ie any z which sees all z in the extreme ALS is false
In arkietech's example
we have 12356r1357c9+2579r7c235+37r9c1 ie
{31265} {5297} {73} = <3>r9c9 <3>r3c1 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|