View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Clement
Joined: 24 Apr 2006 Posts: 1111 Location: Dar es Salaam Tanzania
|
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2015 10:34 pm Post subject: Jan 15 VH |
|
|
Code: |
+----------+------------+----------+
| 8 15 9 | 345 7 45 | 2 13 6 |
| 7 6 2 | 1 #35 9 | 4 8 35 |
| 4 3 15 | 6 8 2 | 19 7 59 |
+----------+------------+----------+
| 15 4 3 | 8 9 15 | 6 2 7 |
| 9 8 6 | 47 2 47 | 3 5 1 |
| 15 2 7 | #35 15-3 6 | 8 9 4 |
+----------+------------+----------+
| 2 79 4 | *57 *15 3 | 19 6 8 |
| 3 15 15 | 9 6 8 | 7 4 2 |
| 6 79 8 | 2 4 17 | 5 13 39 |
+----------+------------+----------+
| W-Wing 35 in Box 25 with SL 5 in row 7 r6c5<>3; stte. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TerenceF
Joined: 21 Dec 2007 Posts: 26 Location: Takapuna, NZ
|
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 2:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
From exactly the same point as Clement there is a 157 XY wing pivoted on r9c6 which eliminates the 5 from r6c4, also making r6c5<>3 leading to the same outcome. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Clement
Joined: 24 Apr 2006 Posts: 1111 Location: Dar es Salaam Tanzania
|
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 2:29 pm Post subject: Jan 15 VH |
|
|
I feel BUG+2 to be the simplest
5r6c5=3r2c5
5r1c4=3r2c5 so, r2c5=3. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rmireland
Joined: 21 Sep 2013 Posts: 33 Location: New Orleans
|
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 6:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
More and more lately I have been using the "Fishy" xy with these VH puzzles. Today I used the Fishy 135 xy pivoted in r1c8, with pincers at r2c9 and r1c2, to eliminate the 5 in r2c5. With stte, I never look back (until someone posts a real answer), but these Fishies do solve it about half the time. -Rick |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dongrave
Joined: 06 Mar 2014 Posts: 568
|
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 6:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Clement, Marty told me a long time ago that w-wings, BUG+2, UR's, skyscrapers, jellyfish, etc. are not considered 'standard advanced moves' for this site. He told me that every VH on this site can be solved using just x-wings, xy-wings, and xyz-wings and since that's the case, that's the solution that I always look for and consider it to be the 'official' solution. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Clement
Joined: 24 Apr 2006 Posts: 1111 Location: Dar es Salaam Tanzania
|
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 9:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dongrave, I just wanted a change for a while. But what is important I think is a logical move to the solution. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dongrave
Joined: 06 Mar 2014 Posts: 568
|
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2015 1:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Clement, I didn't make myself clear. I always enjoy checking out the single-step solutions that you and Dan and Marty and all the others post. I was just giving my opinion as to which solution I thought should be the site's 'official' solution. Don. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RobertRattley
Joined: 24 Jun 2007 Posts: 118 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2015 7:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've known for a long time that all VH puzzles on this site can be expected to be solvable (and so far always have been) with x, xy or xyz wings, and I seek solutions accordingly. That is simply my preference.
But I do not see this as "official". If anything, it would be a limitation that this site imposes on itself.
I've also been wondering (for years) if this site will ever expand to a new category "extra hard" or similar, for puzzles that even x, xy or xyz wings can't solve. Will it ever happen, does anybody know? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2015 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Robert, it is extremely unlikely that that will happen. The site's owner says he doesn't have time to devote to the site. He has been an absentee owner for a number of years now. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dongrave
Joined: 06 Mar 2014 Posts: 568
|
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 1:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
RobertRattley wrote: | I've known for a long time that all VH puzzles on this site can be expected to be solvable (and so far always have been) with x, xy or xyz wings, and I seek solutions accordingly. That is simply my preference.
But I do not see this as "official". If anything, it would be a limitation that this site imposes on itself.
I've also been wondering (for years) if this site will ever expand to a new category "extra hard" or similar, for puzzles that even x, xy or xyz wings can't solve. Will it ever happen, does anybody know? |
Hi Robert, Since we're given the premise that all VHs on this site can be solved using just wings, the site's 'official' solutions should only include those moves. I appreciate shorter solutions that use more advanced moves but I wouldn't consider them official solutions for this site because they're outside the range of the premise.
One day last year I chimed in with what I thought was the best official solution for a puzzle (which included a UR) at which point Marty explained to me that URs were not 'standard VH moves' for this site (he even used the phrase 'officially speaking'). Since then, I look for solutions that just use 'standard VH moves', even if I spot an obvious UR along the way.
Today's VH puzzle (02/02/15) is a perfect example! Even though I saw the URs right away, I knew that they weren't necessary - so I disregarded them until I found the standard XY wing. I can't be the only around that feels this way! (or am I?) I'm sure that Keith feels the same way and I'm pretty sure that Marty used to (but I'm not sure about now because I see that he used a UR today). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 3:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
He used the Ur because he failed to see the wing. I always prefer to solve these using the standard VH moves, but I'm having some difficulty grasping the concept of an "official" solution. Maybe what you mean by "official" solution could alternatively be called "standard" solution. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dongrave
Joined: 06 Mar 2014 Posts: 568
|
Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 3:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
That's it! You've got it Marty! I've been saying 'official solution' over and over but 'standard solution' is much better! (Seems obvious now.) I guess a solution using just 'standard moves' would surely be best described as a 'standard solution', wouldn't it? That's perfect! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|