View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
hughwill
Joined: 05 Apr 2010 Posts: 424 Location: Birmingham UK
|
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 2:34 pm Post subject: Feb 18 VH |
|
|
Code: |
+--------+--------------+---------------+
| 6 9 5 | 12 7 123 | 4 23 8 |
| 2 3 7 | 8 4 5 | 9 1 6 |
| 4 8 1 | 269 236 239 | 7 5 23 |
+--------+--------------+---------------+
| 1 5 4 | 3 28 7 | 28 6 9 |
| 3 6 28 | 1245 9 124 | 1258 247 1257 |
| 9 7 28 | 1245 258 6 | 3 24 125 |
+--------+--------------+---------------+
| 7 2 6 | 49 35 49 | 15 8 135 |
| 5 1 3 | 7 26 8 | 26 9 4 |
| 8 4 9 | 256 1 23 | 256 237 2357 |
+--------+--------------+---------------+
|
Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site
I got to this so late I thought that someone would have shared a solution by
now! A solution: Quote: | X-Wing on 2 r48 followed by 26-3 XY-Wing pivot r8c5 | Hugh |
|
Back to top |
|
|
George Woods
Joined: 28 Mar 2006 Posts: 304 Location: Dorset UK
|
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 4:03 pm Post subject: a 1 stepper? |
|
|
I considered r6c5 which if 8 sets r8c5 to 6 very quickly BUT if r6c5 is not 8 the XY wing 325 pivot r7c5 again makes r8c5 6 stte |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hughwill
Joined: 05 Apr 2010 Posts: 424 Location: Birmingham UK
|
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 6:17 pm Post subject: Re: a 1 stepper? |
|
|
George Woods wrote: | I considered r6c5 which if 8 sets r8c5 to 6 very quickly BUT if r6c5 is not 8 the XY wing 325 pivot r7c5 again makes r8c5 6 stte | Neat. What would you call such a solution? Provisonal XY-wing Elimination?
Hugh |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2016 12:57 am Post subject: Re: a 1 stepper? |
|
|
hughwill wrote: | George Woods wrote: | I considered r6c5 which if 8 sets r8c5 to 6 very quickly BUT if r6c5 is not 8 the XY wing 325 pivot r7c5 again makes r8c5 6 stte | Neat. What would you call such a solution? Provisonal XY-wing Elimination?
Hugh |
I would call it a Forcing Chain or something akin.
R6c5<8> 6r8c5
R8c5=8=> 6r8c5.
Quote: | Dongrave wrote in another thread
Darn x wings! There ought be a law against them. |
I heartily agree. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|